Birmingham Uni, Birmingham

18 Mar 2023

Contact Details: 

[email protected]

Please contact the organiser, not OpenTrack, for all queries

Results Competitors   (105)

The University of Birmingham Winter Throws and Distance Meet returns for 2023 with more energy and atmosphere than ever before!

Alongside our trademark Birmingham atmosphere, this meet will have:

  • Electronic timing and EDM
  • High quality competition, with World, Commonwealth, and Paralympic games standards hit at our meets before
  • Several event photographers capturing your best angles
  • Delicious food and coffee from local Birmingham vendor, Really Awesome Coffee!

WE ANTICIPATE THIS EVENT WILL SELL OUT QUICKLY. IF YOUR EVENT IS SOLD OUT PLEASE FILL OUT THIS FORM TO REQUEST A PLACE ON THE WAITING LIST.

We would also be delighted to welcome disabilty athletes in any of our events. For any specific questions or requests relating to these events please contact Dean Miller directly at [email protected]

Summary Statistics (click to expand):

Events: 8 Competitors: 105 Results: 122 Unknown athletes: 1

Best/10th/100th age grades: 89.66% / 85.29% / 0.0%

Best/10th/100th (% WR): 87.54% / 85.07% / 0.0%

This calculated data is experimental, and not guaranteed to be correct and consistent
University of Birmingham Winter Throws and Distance Meet

Birmingham Uni, Birmingham

Best age graded performances during the meeting
% WR % Age Grade Name (Age) Event Perf
86.7 89.66 James Knockton (18) Race 4 of 4 14:31.25
87.39 88.34 Flynn Jennings (20) Race 4 of 4 14:24.35
84.74 87.63 James Vaughan (18) Race 4 of 4 14:51.39
87.54 87.54 Luke Vine (27) Race 4 of 4 14:22.92
86.9 87.24 Kristian Imroth (21) Race 4 of 4 14:29.26
86.51 86.51 Amelia Samuels (21) Race 2 of 4 16:18.60
84.67 86.49 Finley Proffitt (19) Race 4 of 4 14:52.07
85.74 85.74 Bryony Gunn (25) Race 1 of 4 16:27.48
85.7 85.7 Michael Wilson (27) Race 4 of 4 14:41.35
85.29 85.29 Adam Peacock (30) Race 4 of 4 14:45.64
% WR is World Masters Athletics age grade as if aged as senior; effectively a percentage of world best in 2010.
This calculated data is experimental, and not guaranteed to be correct and consistent
robot check